729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(617) 994-5800 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Tara Boghosian is a committed advocate for workers’ rights as well as economic and social justice. She works on cases advancing wage and hour, misclassification, and discrimination claims.
Tara graduated from Harvard Law School in 2020, where she completed over 2000 pro bono hours. During law school, she was involved with the International Human Rights Clinic, Prison Legal Assistance Project, Housing Law Clinic, and Harvard Mediation Program. As part of her work with the International Human Rights Clinic, she contributed to a project seeking to advance the human rights of informal workers.
In addition to working at Lichten & Liss-Riordan, she interned at the National Center for Law and Economic Justice and the Bronx Defenders Impact Litigation Practice. She was also a Research Assistant for Alicia Ely Yamin and a Negotiation Workshop Teaching Assistant. Her written work has or will appear in the Oxford Handbook of Economic and Social Rights, Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, and the OnLabor blog.
Harvard Law School, J.D., Cum Laude
McGill University, B.A. in English Cultural Studies, First-Class Honors
Massachusetts and California bar admission pending. Not yet licensed to practice in any jurisdiction.
Anastasia Doherty is a dedicated workers’ rights advocate, who proudly represents workers asserting wage-and-hour and individual discrimination claims against their employers. She is currently involved in a number of cases in which employees have been misclassified as independent contractors, including exotic dancers, workers in the healthcare industry, and workers for “gig economy” companies, such as Uber and Lyft.
Anastasia attended Georgetown University, where she studied English and Justice & Peace, and went on to attend Northeastern University School of Law (NUSL). At Northeastern, she served as a staff member of the Northeastern University Law Review, as a Lawyering Fellow, and as a Teaching and Researching Assistant. She also published a law review article in the Women’s Rights Law Reporter, a quarterly journal founded by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and published by Rutgers Law School.
During law school, Anastasia focused her studies on civil rights and client advocacy. She represented individuals seeking abuse and harassment prevention orders in Massachusetts state court as a student attorney through the Northeastern Domestic Violence Institute (DVI), and represented individuals in restraining order and family law matters in Illinois state court as a student attorney with LAF (Legal Aid Foundation of Chicago). Anastasia worked on civil rights litigation at LAF (specifically Title IX) and through her internship at the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) of Massachusetts. She also interned at the Women’s Bar Foundation.
Prior to law school, Anastasia worked at a foundation that focused on reproductive health and justice and early childhood issues and worked on criminal justice reform at CUNY (City University of New York) John Jay College.
Northeastern University School of Law, J.D.
Georgetown University, B.A. in English, Certificate Justice & Peace Studies
Member, State Bar of Massachusetts, 2019
Zach Rubin is a committed employees’ rights advocate who represents workers in wage and hour litigation, employment discrimination matters, and labor disputes in state and federal courts and before administrative agencies. He is currently engaged in a number of collective and class actions and individual employment matters involving workers across industries in the private and public sectors.
Zach has practiced labor and employment law since graduating from law school and previously worked for a prominent union-side law firm in Connecticut and as in-house counsel at a labor union in Connecticut. Zach enjoys the breadth of factual and legal issues that labor and employment attorneys must grapple with and has played key roles in litigation victories for his clients, including a 2017 case establishing that the employment protections in Connecticut’s medical marijuana statute are not preempted by federal law (the first time a federal court ruled on such an issue).
During law school, Zach worked as a law clerk at a union-side labor law firm in New York City and interned at Actors’ Equity Association, the National Labor Relations Board (Region 2), the New York State Supreme Court (trial level), and the NYC Office of Collective Bargaining. Additionally, Zach has long appreciated the importance of Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) in modern legal practice and served as Co-President of Brooklyn Law School’s ADR Society.
Brooklyn Law School, J.D., 2015
Cornell University, B.S. in Industrial and Labor Relations, 2012
Member, State Bar of Massachusetts, 2019
Member, State Bar of Connecticut, 2016
Member, State Bar of New York, 2016
Member, State Bar of New Jersey, 2015
Admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts, U.S. District Court of Connecticut, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. District Court of New Jersey, and the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Michelle Cassorla is a committed public interest attorney who represents employees in wage and hour class action litigation.
Prior to joining Lichten & Liss-Riordan, Michelle was an associate at a union-side labor law firm in Washington, DC. She previously worked at Bread for the City, an anti-poverty non-profit, representing low-income DC residents in family law cases. Michelle also served as a law clerk for the Honorable Neal E. Kravitz of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
While in law school, Michelle represented individuals in unemployment benefit appeals as a student attorney in the Community Justice Project clinic. She also worked as an intern at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, at a plaintiff-side employment discrimination firm, and in the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. Michelle also served as an Executive Articles Editor for the Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy. Before law school, Michelle worked on a political campaign and in campaign consulting.
Georgetown University Law Center, J.D., cum laude, 2013
Cornell University, B.A., summa cum laude in Government and with distinction in all subjects, 2007
Member, State Bar of Massachusetts, 2013
Member, State Bar of District of Columbia, 2015
Member, State Bar of New Jersey, 2017
Admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts, U.S. District Court of District of Columbia, and U.S. District Court of New Jersey
Anne Kramer represents workers in wage and hour litigation in state and federal courts in California and Massachusetts. She is currently involved in a number of class actions and individual arbitrations involving “gig economy” companies, including Uber, Lyft, and many others.
During law school, Anne focused her studies on civil rights and graduated as a Public Interest Designation Fellow. She served as a student-attorney in the Juvenile Rights Advocacy Project, where represented court-involved youth in the Greater Boston area. Anne was also an active member of the Boston College chapter of the National Lawyers Guild and participated in trainings on legal observing for civil rights protests.
Boston College Law School, J.D., cum laude
University of Wisconsin – Madison, B.S., with distinction
Member, State Bar of Massachusetts, 2016
Member, State Bar of California, 2017
United States District Court, Northern District of California
United States District Court, Central District of California
United States District Court, Massachusetts
Matt Carlson represents workers in class action litigation, including wage and hour, hostile work environment, and discrimination disputes in state and federal courts in California and around the country. Matt has partnered with the firm on a number of cases involving “gig economy” companies in California, including Uber and Lyft. Matt also has substantial experience representing farm workers in central California, transportation workers, and individuals wrongfully classified as “overtime exempt” employees under state and federal law.
University of San Francisco School of Law, J.D.
Yale University, B.A., political science
Member, State Bar of California, 2010
United States District Court, Northern District of California
United States District Court, Eastern District of California
United States District Court, Central District of California
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Olena Savytska is a dedicated and persistent client advocate and combines her experience in civil litigation and direct services in her work, approaching every case as a puzzle. Olena has focused on FLSA wage and hour actions in a variety of industries.
Olena began her work in wage and hour actions at the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, where she represented dry cleaning and restaurant workers. As a student at Columbia Law School, Olena helped prepare and present a report to New York State agency members and legislators as part of the Lawyering in the Digital Age Clinic and took part in the 2013 National Native American Law Students Association moot court competition.
During college, Olena worked as a paralegal, gaining significant experience in civil discovery and trial preparation. Olena is fluent in Spanish and Russian.
Columbia Law School, J.D.
Boston College, BA in Political Science and Economics, cum laude
Member, State Bar of Massachusetts, 2015
Admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts
Harold Lichten is a founding partner of the firm and has been practicing labor and employment law for more than 35 years. His practice focuses on class action and individual litigation relating to the misclassification of employees as independent contractors, violations of the wage and hour laws, discrimination based on race, sex, and disability, and wrongful termination based on protected activity. He also represents labor unions including police, firefighters, steelworkers, and electrical workers.
Mr. Lichten is deeply committed to the field of civil rights and the protection of worker rights. He has successfully tried many jury trials, recently recovering nearly $2 million for a City Auditor who was unlawfully fired for testifying against his boss. Mr. Lichten has been lead or co-counsel in landmark employment cases around the country and has obtained significant jury verdicts for individuals who have been the victim of discrimination, retaliation, or whistleblowing, and he has argued and won appeals in the United States Court of Appeals for the First, Third, and Eleventh Circuits. In addition to his representation of classes of employees, individuals, and labor unions, Mr. Lichten has frequently taught courses in employment discrimination, misclassification of workers, and labor law for local, state, and national law organizations.
In 2003 and 2015, he was named Lawyer of the Year by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, and he has been voted a Massachusetts Super Lawyer in each of the last ten years. He is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and New York University School of Law.
Pace v. City of Lynn, Case No. 11-01360, slip op. (Essex Super. Ct., June 6, 2014) (whistleblower case involving city employee with a multi-million dollar verdict won for plaintiff)
Martins, et al. v. 3PD, Inc., 2013 WL 1320454 (D. Mass 2013) (won class certification and summary judgment that appliance delivery drivers were employees, not independent contractors)
Sam Hargrove, et al. v. Sleepy’s, et al., Case Nos. 12-2541/12-2542 (3rd Cir. 2013) (won reversal and remand of decision finding New Jersey truck drivers to be independent contractors, not employees of Sleepy’s)
Scantland, et al. v. Jeffry Knight, Inc., et al., 721 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir. 2013) (reversing trial court ruling that cable installers were properly classified as independent contractors)
Lopez, et al. v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 463 Mass. 696 (2012) (Supreme Court of Massachusetts reversed lower court decision and held that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts may be held liable under state discrimination law for constructing discriminatory promotional exams)
Amero v. Townsend Oil Company, 2008 WL 5609064 (Mass. Super. 2008) (in one of the first decisions issued under the Massachusetts Independent Contractor statute, the court held as a matter of law that an oil delivery employee had been wrongfully misclassified as an independent contractor)
Welch v. Town of Stoughton, 542 F.3d 927 (1st Cir. 2008) (won appeal and jury verdict finding that the Town of Stoughton had violated the First Amendment and whistleblower rights of a sergeant in the Town’s police department)
Bradley et al. v. City of Lynn et al., 403 F.Supp.2d 161 (D.Mass. 2005) (a successful class action lawsuit which resulted in a finding that the entry-level civil service examination for fire fighters in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts discriminated against minority candidates)
Quinn v. City of Boston, 325 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2003) (striking down Boston’s 30-year-old hiring system for fire fighters as discriminatory)
Sprague v. United Airlines, Inc., 2002 WL 1803733 (D.Mass. 2002) (won an 18-day disability discrimination trial, proving that United Airlines unlawfully rejected an applicant for an airline mechanic position because he was deaf, resulting in judgment of more than $1 million)
Dahill v. Police Dept. of Boston, 434 Mass. 233 (2001) (establishing the legal definition of a disability in Massachusetts and won a jury trial verdict of close to $1 million for a police officer wrongfully denied hiring because of a disability)
Maine Human Rights Commission v. City of Auburn, 408 A.2d 1253 (Maine 1979) (landmark sex discrimination case requiring the hiring of the City’s first female police officer)
Mr. Lichten was named a 2003 and 2015 Lawyer of the Year by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.
Boston police lieutenant exam discriminated against minorities, judge says
The Boston Globe | July, 2017
Judge rules Boston police exam discriminated against minorities
The Boston Globe | November, 2015
Court suspends probation officer demotions
The Boston Globe | August, 2015
MCAD ruling supports black Worcester officers passed over for promotion
Telegram & Gazette | July, 2015
NJ’s Definition of ‘Employee’ Revives Sleepy’s Class Suit
New Jersey Law Journal | May, 2015
Fired official wins suit vs. city
The Boston Globe | June, 2014
Black police officials sue city
The Boston Globe | February, 2012
Police hit with bias decision; Two officers may be due ‘millions’
Worcester Telegram | November, 2011
Endo Sales Reps Win Conditional Cert. For OT Suit
Law 360 | June, 2011
Sebring men sue MasTec for OT pay
Tampa Bay Online | June, 2010
Contractors cry foul over benefit-excluding system
St. Petersburg Times | December, 2009
Independent contractor decision has lawyers wary
Mass Lawyers Weekly | December, 2008
Judge says firefighter tests biased and unfair
The Boston Globe | August, 2006
Organized labor of love
The Boston Globe | February, 2005
New York University School of Law, J.D., 1977
University of Pennsylvania, B.A., 1974
Member, National Employment Lawyers Association
Member, AFL-CIO Lawyers Coordinating Committee
Member, State Bar of Massachusetts, since 1987
Member, State Bar of Maine, since 1978
Admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. District Court of Massachusetts, U.S. District Court of Maine, the U.S. Court of Appeals, First, Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits.
Labor unions, wage and hour class actions, wrongful termination, employment discrimination
Shannon Liss-Riordan is widely recognized as one of the nation’s top plaintiffs’ class action employment lawyers. She has reshaped industries through her pioneering successes representing tipped workers, employees misclassified as independent contractors, and low wage workers who have been denied overtime, minimum wage, and other wage protections. Best Lawyers in America has called her “the reigning plaintiffs’ champion” (2013) and has said she is “probably the best known wage class action lawyer on the plaintiff side in this area, if not the entire country” (2015). Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly described her on its “Power List” (2009) as a “Tenacious class-action plaintiffs’ lawyer [who] strikes fear in big-firm employment attorneys throughout Boston with her multi-million-dollar victories on behalf of strippers, waiters, skycaps and other non-exempt employees.” Politico named her to its guide to the “Top 50 thinkers, doers and visionaries transforming American politics in 2016”. San Francisco Magazine has said that “Liss-Riordan has achieved a kind of celebrity unseen in the legal world since Ralph Nader sued General Motors.”
For 20 years, Ms. Liss-Riordan has brought and won groundbreaking lawsuits that have shaped the law protecting workers in the food service, cleaning, adult entertainment, trucking, and other industries. She is currently representing workers in a number of cases against “gig economy” companies that save on labor costs by misclassifying employees as independent contractors. She represents employees nationally, at the trial court and appellate levels, including six landmark victories at the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Some of her most notable cases include victories against Starbucks, FedEx, and American Airlines. The Boston Globe has profiled her work twice as a “legal champion” fighting for the rights of low wage workers, and she has also been profiled in such publications as the Wall Street Journal, Mother Jones, and the LA Times.
A graduate of Harvard Law School and Harvard College, Ms. Liss-Riordan co-founded Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C. in 2009. Previously she was a partner at a plaintiff-side employment and union law firm in Boston where she worked for more than 10 years after clerking for a federal court judge for two years following law school.
Worker Rights Atty Blazes Trail With Whole Foods, Uber Cases
Law360 | July, 2020
Uber’s Worst Nightmare
San Francisco Magazine | May, 2016
Meet the attorney suing Uber, Lyft, GrubHub and a dozen California tech firms
LA Times | January, 2016
Meet “Sledgehammer Shannon,” the Lawyer Who Is Uber’s Worst Nightmare
Mother Jones | December, 2015
Meet the Lawyer Challenging the Food-Delivery Industry
Eater | December, 2015
Meet the Boston Lawyer Who’s Putting Uber on Trial
Wall Street Journal | November, 2015
‘Sledgehammer Shannon:’ The attorney taking on Uber and others in the sharing economy
Bizwomen | September, 2015
What Strippers Can Teach Uber
Medium | April, 2015
Meet the lawyer taking on Uber and the rest of the on-demand economy
Fusion | April, 2015
2014 Top Women of Law
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly | December, 2014
The worker’s champion
CommonWealth Magazine | July, 2013
Lawyer fights for low-wage workers’ rights
Boston Globe | December, 2012
Skycaps and waiters find a legal champion
Boston Globe | April, 2008
Best Lawyers in America (each year since 2008)
Massachusetts Super Lawyers (each year since 2005)
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Lawyer of the Year (2002)
Lawyer of the Year
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly | December, 2002
Harvey A. Schwartz, Boston employment and civil rights lawyer, on Shannon Liss-Riordan
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly | December, 2002
Vazquez v. Jan-Pro, No. 17-16096, __ F.3d __ (9th Cir. 2019) (holding that landmark Dynamex decision applies retroactively, including to misclassification claims against “cleaning franchisor”, and applies to top-tier company in multi-tier “fissured employment” scheme; providing guidance on strength of ABC test for employment misclassification; and reinstating wage claims on behalf of janitors who challenged paying for their jobs and other wage violations)
Haitayan v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. 18-55462, __ F.3d __ (9th Cir. 2019) (reinstating wage claims against 7-Eleven and reversing district court’s denial of injunction for plaintiffs and potential class members facing choice of pursuing wage claims or keeping their jobs)
Maplebear dba Instacart v. Busick, No. A151677 __.Cal.App.5th__ (2018) (rejecting attempt to vacate arbitrator award certifying wage class action on behalf of Instacart drivers)
Khanal v. San Francisco Hilton, Inc., No. 15-15493 (9th Cir. 2017) (banquet employees could bring claim for service charges not distributed to them, reversing order holding wage claims brought by union employees preempted by LMRA)
Williams v. Jani–King, 837 F.3d 314 (3d Cir. 2016) (affirming class certification in case challenging cleaning workers’ classification as independent contractor “franchisees” under Pennsylvania law)
Marzuq v. Cadete Enterprises, Inc., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21301 (1st Cir. 2015) (Dunkin Donuts general managers could be eligible for time-and-a-half overtime pay by proving management was not their primary duty, distinguishing 1982 Burger King precedent, which had held fast food managers to be overtime-exempt)
Travers v. Flight Systems & Services, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21671 (1st Cir. 2015) (affirming jury verdict in favor of skycap who was terminated in retaliation for leading class action wage complaint challenging policy affecting skycaps’ tips and reinstating claim for front pay)
Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, 465 Mass. 607 (2013) (Supreme Judicial Court held that national cleaning company could be liable for misclassifying cleaning workers, notwithstanding that contracts were with intermediary companies)
Taylor v. Eastern Connection, 465 Mass. 191 (2013) (Supreme Judicial Court held that Massachusetts law could apply to work performed outside of the state, due to choice-of-law provision in workers’ contracts)
Matamoros v. Starbucks, 699 F.3d 129 (1st Cir. 2012) (Starbucks violated Massachusetts tips law by allowing supervisors to share in tip pool, resulting in $23.5 million settlement, removal of supervisors from tip pool, and $3/hour pay raise for supervisors)
Awuah v. Coverall North America, 460 Mass. 484 (2011) (“franchisee” cleaning workers who were misclassified as independent contractors could recover refund of “franchisee fees”, insurance, and other deductions from their pay; ruling led to resolution of a number of cases against “cleaning franchise” companies in Massachusetts, reimbursement to thousands of workers, and transfer of cleaning accounts from companies to workers)
DiFiore v. American Airlines, 454 Mass. 486 (2009) (affirming verdict in favor of skycaps, holding that non-employer airline could be liable under Massachusetts tips law)
Chaves v. King Arthur’s Lounge (Mass. Super. 2007) (exotic dancers were misclassified as independent contractors; ruling led to series of successful cases against adult entertainment establishments in Massachusetts and nationally)
Skirchak v. Dynamics Research Corporation, Inc., 508 F.3d 49 (1st Cir. 2007) (class action waiver in employer’s mandatory arbitration policy was unenforceable)
Cooney v. Compass Group Foodservice, 69 Mass.App.Ct. 632 (2007) (Appeals Court held that servers were entitled as a matter of law to receive proceeds of service charges added to function bills)
Smith v. Winter Place LLC d/b/a Locke-Ober Co., Inc., 447 Mass. 363 (2006) (Supreme Judicial Court held that employees are engaged in protected activity, and cannot be retaliated against, when they raise internal complaints about alleged wage violations)
Gasior v. Massachusetts General Hospital, 446 Mass. 645 (2006) (Supreme Judicial Court held that discrimination claim survives the death of the plaintiff, including claim for punitive damages)
Norrell v. Spring Valley Country Club (Mass. Super. 2017) (class action jury verdict for waitstaff)
Travers v. Flight Systems & Services (D. Mass. 2014) (close to $1 million jury verdict in favor of skycap who was terminated in retaliation for bringing wage complaint about policy affecting skycaps’ tips)
DiFiore v. American Airlines (D. Mass. 2008) (jury verdict in favor of skycaps, finding that airline violated state tips law and interfered with skycaps’ relationship with passengers by charging $2 per bag and not allowing skycaps to keep the proceeds of the charge; verdict led to airline dropping charge nationwide) (damages award reversed on federal preemption grounds)
Benoit v. The Federalist, Inc. (Mass. Super. 2007) (class action jury verdict in favor of waitstaff who did not receive total proceeds of service charges added to function bills)
Bradley v. City of Lynn, 443 F.Supp.2d 145 (D.Mass. 2006) (class action verdict finding state civil service exam had disparate impact on minorities, resulting in statewide hiring of more than 60 minority firefighters and police officers)
Calcagno v. High Country Investor, Inc. d/b/a Hilltop Steakhouse (Mass. Super. 2006) (class action jury verdict finding management illegally skimmed servers’ gratuities)
Sprague v. United Airlines, Inc., 2002 WL 1803733 (D. Mass 2002) (judgment of $1.1 million in a discrimination case brought by deaf airline mechanic who had been denied employment based on disability)
Dahill v. Boston Police Department, 434 Mass. 233 (2001) (Supreme Judicial Court decided that Massachusetts law would diverge from federal law in prohibiting discrimination against individuals with correctable disabilities, resulting in hiring of hearing-impaired police officer candidate and jury verdict of nearly $1 million)
Harvard Law School, J.D., 1996
Harvard College, A.B., 1990
Member, State Bar of Massachusetts, 1999
Member, State Bar of New York, 1999
Member, State Bar of California, 2016
Admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeal for the First, Second, Third, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuit.
Ben Weber is a committed workers’ rights advocate with a lengthy record of public service. After graduating from law school in 2005, Ben was awarded an Equal Justice Works Fellowship and began work at Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid, where he represented migrant farm workers in complex federal employment litigation throughout the South.
Prior to joining the firm, Ben worked for four years as Assistant Attorney General in the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office. Ben worked in the Attorney General’s Fair Labor Division, where he prosecuted employers for violations of Massachusetts’ wage laws.
Ben later worked in the Attorney General’s Administrative Law Division where he represented numerous state agencies and boards in cases challenging administrative decisions. During that time, Ben briefed and argued more than 30 cases in the Massachusetts Appeals Court and developed an expertise in many areas of administrative law, including unemployment, licensure, and parental rights.
University of Iowa College of Law, J.D., 2005
Brandeis University, B.A., 1996
Morry Stein Award of Valor
Member, State Bar of Massachusetts, 2008
Member, State Bar of Tennessee, 2005